links for 2009-08-11

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

US: The Obamamessiah is featured in UCLA’s dictionary

Obama aparece en un diccionario como sinónimo de moderno – Yahoo! Noticias

A dictionary of US jargon features in his sixth and last edition the word “obama” as synonim of something modern, cool, that gets on well with everybody. The dictionary, that gets published every four years, is made by the language specialist Pamela Munro and her students of California University, LA (UCLA).

Well, he certainly doesn’t get on very well with the opposition, specially when the White House is asking people to help them… tracking people opposed to Health Care:

If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.

Wow, this is very obama… not really cool at all, but very obama.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , ,

Formula 1: Ecclestone sorry about “Hitler” remarks

So now we are sorry for our statements, aren’t we, Ecclestone?

After describing the outrage sparked by his Hitler comments as a “big misunderstanding” in the German press, Bernie Ecclestone has now turned to the English-speaking media to apologise for the affair.

Jewish groups called for the F1 chief executive’s resignation following his controversial Times interview, while a German state premier cancelled a meeting this weekend to discuss the future of the F1 race at Hockenheim.

“First, an apology,” the 78-year-old wrote in a column in the same British newspaper on Tuesday.

Ecclestone insisted he does not “support Hitler’s atrocities” and admits he was “unwise … to articulate my points so badly”.

via Shamed Ecclestone goes on ‘sorry’ offensive – Worldcarfans.

What a jackass!

Ecclestone endorses tyrannies

The billionaire and Formula I Chief has recognised in an interview his devotion for “strong leaders” and that Hitler was good at getting things done:

apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done.
“In the end he got lost, so he wasn’t a very good dictator because either he had all these things and knew what was going on and insisted, or he just went along with it . . . so either way he wasn’t a dictator.” He also rounded on democracy, claiming that “it hasn’t done a lot of good for many countries — including this one [Britain]”.

And in a proof of his cultivated mind he stated:

Napoleon or Stalin? I didn’t know either of those guys, to be honest 

 Impressive!