And that threat can eventually change Western priorities in Afghan war.
“If we think Pakistan is more important than Afghanistan, which it definitely is because of nuclear weapons, because of 170 million people, because of millions of Pakistani migrants in Britain and Canada and elsewhere, then that has to have some repercussions for our Afghan strategy and for our stabilizing strategy for Pakistan.” .
And how are Western countries to do that IF Pakistani Govt doesn’t want ANY kind of foreign interference?
Advertisement
[...] the world, these guys from NYT want India to reduce the troops level there, even after experts have warned about terrorist attacks on Pakistani nuclear sites. Who is writing those articles? Mr [...]
[...] Talibans need to increase the violence in the area, if they want really to desestabilize it and fulfill AQ’s plans. [...]
[...] if it’s linked to an increased suprevision of Pakistani nuclear arsenal, even if there are sufficient proofs of it being targeted and a no. 1 among AQ’s [...]
[...] threat has been worrying experts since some time ago. The surprising (not really) thing here is that Talibans were using US [...]